Ben Swann on Resurrect the Republic – 14th Amendment “Secret Constitution” Discussed – Agrees To Peer Review Our Research
RELEASE OF RESEARCH POSTER

The research we stand upon is “officially delivered” to who we believe is the representative of the true “free press”. We would like to publicly salute Ben Swann for his integrity and tenacity in journalism, he is an inspiration to all of us. In fact it was Ben who inspired me to consider radio. I saw “one” man with integrity , when I thought the media “PROPAGANDA MACHINE” was too big. I saw this man light brush fires in the hearts and minds of the people and myself. Please visit Ben Swann’s site and support his work.

RELEASED TO BEN SWANN with pride and respect in the integrity of his work, and his dedication to the truth. This is a presentation of the research, and my assessment of what “I believe” was the most destructive conspiracy to undermine the Republic. Psychological Warfare is not all science fiction. It is the use of the Hegelian dialectic, problem creation and solution, along with changing by unlawful means or “subversion”, and yes, even “infiltration”, and most definitely extreme corruption. It is our obligation to go where the evidence and the facts take us.

——————————————————————————————————————————–

THE 14TH AMENDMENT IS UN-CONSTITUTIONAL

——————————————————————————————————————————–
AN USURPATION OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION
NOT TO EXCEED A 10 MILE SQUARE
Submitted to : Ben Swann –                                                                                           http://BenSwann.com
(I do NOT speak for any organization. Bruce and I speak for ourselves)

This has been prepared to give solution to the problems that have chained us
and for the people of the Constitutional Republic of the United States of America
By Bruce Ray Riggs and Thomas Robert Lacovara-Stewart
Resurrect The Republic/Dirty Uncle Sam TRUTH Radio Broadcast
and the staff of volunteers known to us as our “Most Trusted”
Constitutional Researchers, historians, and keepers of the True Organic Constitutional Oath

——————————————————————————————————————————–A message to Patriots and Keepers of the Constitutional Oath :

To the Sons And Daughters of Liberty, for you and our fellow countrymen, we pledge our lives, our fortunes, our sacred honor, and we do also hereby provide a lawful argument against the jurisdictional usurpation by the federal government, which to prove, we believe, is well beyond a reasonable doubt, that concludes that the jurisdiction the federal government has, is a fraction of that of which it was intended, and in fact by means of deception as a result of a treasonous conspiracy, it has been “TAKEN”, by means of slow and gradual methodical and systematically programmed criminal, and treasonous progressive usurpation. It has been a long and exhausting journey of research and evidence gathering.  While we may come under fire or be criticized as to our intentions, it is only TRUTH we seek NOT to undermine rights, but to once and for all attempt to shed light on this co-opting of legislation that exists to do one thing, but sold to the people as another. It literally made all 14th Amendment citizens responsible for a debt that we have on our heads to this day and has empowered the federal government in huge ways.

 

A BRIEF TO SUPPORT THAT AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION IS THE ISSUE
CITIZENSHIP, PERSON, and the creation of a “CORPORATE RECONSTRUCTION” was, is and continues to be unlawful. Thus, as we wonder why things keep getting worse and our legislators act with seemingly unrestricted ways, why this is is identified and the solution forthwith is included

The ORIGINAL “citizen” that the U.S. Constitution created is found under
Article 4 – Section 2 (state citizen)
EXHIBIT A – http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/constitution.pdf

Then in the year of Our Lord 1862, Congress redefined the meaning of the word PERSON, to include the definition “CORPORATION”, among other things.
EXHIBIT B http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/Person-act.pdf
Then in 1868 the unlawful “alleged” ratification, the 14th Amendment created a different type of “citizen”, making ALL “persons”, CORPORATIONS, to be considered “CITIZENS” of the UNITED STATES, and “SUBJECT TO” the “JURISDICTION” thereof.
The United States as understood in this context = Washington D.C. Or doing business as the United States Incorporated
February 1st ,1871
EXHIBIT C – http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/United_States.pdf
(This is critically important to understand the meaning and subversion of the term….as these men were of Great Britain, they full well knew and understood these meanings, but the populace did not……compare “citizens” and “persons” to the old English “serfs” in Feudal times…… Essentially, to be “subject to this jurisdiction” makes one a “voluntary servant” or “serf” or “subjects” as compared to British subjects, what we fled to the colonies for to begin with……this was mentioned as “no INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE, but no mention of VOLUNTARY SERVITUDE, which was a Trojan horse……as they will go on to use clever forceful manipulation to get us to be lawfully “voluntary” but by doing so void of providing notification when this is done……thus making it UNLAWFUL or NULL as a result.

Note: This “corporation” was given all the powers not inconsistent with the laws of the ORIGINAL ORGANIC Constitution of the United States, which means it is CONSISTENT, double speak, or double talk.

EXHIBIT D-1 “SUBJECT TO” you can find in Blacks Law Dictionary, 5th edition, Page 1278
Which means as follows…. “liable, subordinate, inferior, obedient to, governed or affected by; provided ; answerable for…… And jurisdiction of course means “legal” not necessarily “lawful” authority.

EXHIBIT D-2 – 14th Amendment (FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT) Blacks Law Dictionary 5th edition, page 591 (in part). It became a part of the ORGANIC LAW, on July 28, 1868. It created, or at least reckoned for the first time a citizen of the United States of distinct…..of that of the state – (Article 4, Section 2 – ORGANIC CONSTITUTION – ORIGINAL STATE CITIZEN)

Note: If you are a citizen of the United States, you are by this reconstruction, no longer a human being on the land, but a CORPORATION, says the United States Supreme Court, a designation and classification that was intended to apply to ships and vessels in a “COMMERCIAL CAPACITY” .

 

A corporation is a person within the meaning of the “equal protection”, “due process” provision of the U.S. Constitution – example –
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE V. WARD, ALABAMA 470 U.S. 869, 105 S. CT. 1676- 1683 84 L. ED. 2D 751 ALSO; See Blacks Law Dictionary 5th edition- “person, corporation” page 1028
EXHIBIT D-3 – http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=470&invol=869
The United States went from being a Constitutional Republic in the year of 1868, to a “FEDERAL CORPORATION”, so says US CODE TITLE 28 USC 3002 15 (a)
EXHIBIT – E – http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002 – ALL CRIMES, state or federal are considered COMMERCIAL CRIMES so says CODE of the Federal Regulation TITLE 27 72.11
EXHIBIT F – http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/27/72.11

——————————————————————————————————————————–

EXAMPLE OF HOW THIS AFFECTS YOU :

COMMERCIAL CODE ENFORCEMENT  OR REVENUE GENERATION  DESTROYS GUN CONTROL ARGUMENT  –  HENCE THERE IS NO ARGUMENT THAT JUSTIFIES IT.

1- the one point they tried to make was that is what police and police alone are there for.

2-While many courageous police officers have, would, and will still be there to help save lives – this is not about intentions, but about law…..and about political lies meant to serve a political agenda.

Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone

By LINDA GREENHOUSE

Published: June 28, 2005
WASHINGTON, June 27 – The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.Click on title for full article.

——————————————————————————————————————————–

EXHIBIT D – 4 (continued from above EXHIBITS E & F). Blacks Law Dictionary 5th edition Page 306 – “CORPORATE CITIZENSHIP” – Corporate status in the state of incorporation, through a foreign corporation is NOT a citizen for purposes of the “privilege and immunities” clause.

U.S. Constitution Article 4, Section 2 “ORIGINAL CONSTITUTIONAL CITIZEN is NOT a corporation – BANK OF AUGUSTA V. EARLE 38 U.S. (13 PET. ) 510, 10 L.ED 274
EXHIBIT – G – http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=38&invol=519

EXHIBIT D – 5 Blacks Law Dictionary 5th edition Pg 104 – Artificial Persons – Persons created and devised by human laws for the purpose of society and government, as distinguished from “natural persons” – CORPORATIONS are examples of “artificial persons”

NOTE: this point, made very clear, shows that the Supreme Law of the Land, regardless of a “reconstructed” corporate model or experiment, regardless of valid or naught, is rendered NULL when held to the Organic Constitution and the Bill of Rights. As the rights therein are shown to be granted by the Creator, and inalienable. The regulations of the Commercial Code DO NOT AND CAN NOT SUPERSEDE THE ORGANIC CONSTITUTION : Which I therefore assert that any and all regulations, commercial or otherwise that regulate, cause to bear license of, or replace RIGHTS with PRIVILEGES that are defined as such under the Supreme Law must be met with absolute resistance as it is OUR DUTY to do so.

THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL 14th AMENDMENT
The 14th Amendment was NOT properly ratified. Congress knows this to be fact and for absolute truth. Every member of Congress received a copy on November 26, 2008 C.R.S. or (Congressional Research Service Report) – Order Code 98-611 GOV prepared for members and committees of Congress,
EXHIBIT H – http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/98-611.pdf/
Page 5 of exhibit H (C.R.S. REPORT) which is C.R.S. – 2 top paragraph, makes it clear that Executive Order 6 or PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION #11 so ORDERED the 14th Amendment Ratified.
EXHIBIT I – http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=015%2Fllsl015.db&recNum=739
EXECUTIVE ORDER #7 or PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION #13 – ORDERED the 14th Amendment lawful and published

Both EXECUTIVE ORDERS 6 and 7 NEVER had the signature of the President.
THE signature on these are of the Secretary of State William Seward, the other individual allegedly attacked and marked with assassination the evening the President, Abraham Lincoln was slain.

These two fake executive orders are booked and paged as Presidential proclamations. As the CRS report makes clear.
Proclamation #12 admitting the states under a newly established legislative bodies replaced the Constitutionally elected one.
The states were blackmailed into ratifying the said 14th Amendment or be denied representation in Congress and remain under marshal law.

Keep in mind the seated president at that time Andrew Johnson was against the 14th
Amendment claiming it created a Unconstitutional de facto government as he pointed out in
his veto address,
EXHIBIT – J – http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llhj&fileName=064%2Fllhj064.db&recNum=562&itemLink=r%3Fammem%2Fhlaw%3A%40field%28DOCID+%40lit%28hj0641%29%29%3A#0640001&linkText=1

EXHIBIT D – 6 – De facto government Blacks Law dictionary 5th Ed. Page 375. “one that displays itself by a force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful at least temporarily in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government and setting up it’s own in lieu thereof. Wortham v. Walker 133 Tex. 255, 128 S.W.2d 1138,1145.

THE 14TH AMENDMENT WAS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY ADOPTED

1) The joint resolution proposing said 14th Amendment was not submitted to or adopted by a Constitutional Congress. Article 1 section 3 and Article 5 of the U.S. Constitution
2) The joint resolution was not submitted to the President for his approval. Article 1 section 7.
3) The proposed 14th Amendment was rejected by more than one-fourth of all the States then in the union, and it was never ratified by three-fourths of all the States in the Union. Article 5.

THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONGRESS

The U.S. Constitution provides:
Article 1 Section 3. “The Senate shall be composed of two Senators from each state”.
Article 5 provides: “No State without it’s consent, shall be deprived of it’s equal suffrage in the Senate”.
The fact that 23 Senators from northern and southern states had been unlawfully excluded from the U.S. Senate, in order to secure a two-thirds vote for adoption the 14th Amendment,

————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
AND DONE SO – ESCORTED OUT BY UNION NSOLDIERS,  LOCKED AND LOADED  & at GUNPOINT ! I urge you to compare this to today…..what if that happened today ?

————————————————————————————————————————————————————-
This one circumstance makes the entire affair so blatantly illegal and or unlawful that it boggles the mind it was able to have been accomplished without bringing us to a state of war all over again.
– and the argument that it was  the Southern States, and therefore they had not the legitimate right to be there, but that argument is, as well,  dashed by the state of NJ also being forced out. It would have possibly made for the legitimate argument years down the line after much was forgotten, such as President Johnson clearly stating that the seceded states were all BACK INTO THE UNION WITH LAWFULLY FUNCTIONING GOVERNING BODIES….

PROOF THAT LEGISLATORS STILL KNOW

THE LOUISIANA LEGISLATURE URGING CONGRESS TO DECLARE THE 14th AMENDMENT ILLEGAL. On June 13,1967, A WELL ANNOTATED LAW DRIVEN BRIEF ON THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE 14th AMENDMENT and how its an act of treason against our Constitution and how it over threw our Constitution, prepared by :
Judge Leander H. Perez, of Louisiana
was memorialized on the House floor.
Memorization page number 15641- 15646 of this LAW DRIVEN Congressional Record, thus, showing how several Unconstitutional acts were done in-order to claim the said 2/3 votes needed for ratification, including 23 senators from northern and southern states were also unlawfully excluded from the US Senate in order to secure this 2/3 vote. All this also included replacing 10 lawful state governments for rejecting the 14th Amendment as Unconstitutional, for the loss of state rights, and how the federal courts will not hear an argument on the invalidity of the 14th Amendment.
EXHIBIT – K – http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/Non_Ratification_14th_Amendment.pdf

EXHIBIT – L – The November 14, 1866 Florida House Journals 2d. Sess, 14th, Gen, Ass. makes clear BEFORE Reconstruction Blacks were equal with whites in every area. It’s a shame after Reconstruction and the 14th Amendment it took Black folks 96 years to to once again achieve this level of equality.
http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/floridaHouse_Journal.pdf

The 13th Amendment to the United States Constitution that abolished slavery was proposed by Joint Resolution of Congress, (13 Statutes at Large, p. 567) and was approved February 1, 1865 by President Abraham Lincoln, as required by Article I, Section 7 of the United States Constitution. the President’s signature is affixed to the Resolution. The 13th Amendment was ratified by 27 states of he then thirty-six (36) states of the Union, including the Southern States of Virginia, Louisiana, Arkansas, South Carolina, Alabama, North Carolina, and Georgia. This is shown by the Proclamation of the Secretary of State December 18, 1865. (13 Statutes at Large, p. 774.) Without the votes of these seven (7) Southern State Legislatures the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery would have failed. The ratification by these seven (7) Southern States of the 13th Amendment again established the fact that their Legislatures and State governments were duly and lawfully constituted and functioning as such under their States Constitutions a year and half before Reconstruction. As stated previously.

EXHIBIT – M – The US Supreme court in COLEMAN v- MILLER 307 US433 (1939) makes clear, that not only were the LAWFUL state governments replaced with new ones for rejecting and not ratifying the 14th Amendment the supreme court never decided on the Constitutionally of the 14th Amendment saying it was political question and never addressed the merits of the 14th Amendment being Constitutional or not.
http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/colemanmiller.pdf
EXHIBIT – N – DYETT V. TURNER (1968)
439 P2d 266, 267
STATE SUPREME COURT OF UTAH STRUCK DOWN THE 14TH AMENDMENT AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IS NOT A REAL AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION.
Also see 267; STATE V. PHILLIPS (1975)
540 P 2d 936; as well as 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law Quarterly 484;
http://www.dirtyunclesam.com/14thexplained.pdf

The Utah Supreme Court in DYETT V. TURNER stated that the “LAWFUL SOLUTION” is public awareness followed by a Constitutional Convention
Per Article 5 to do a investigation on the 14th Amendment being Un-Constitutional.

A FACETIOUS QUESTION, THAT WE ALL KNOW THE ANSWER TO – Is it not Unconstitutional to replace state governments the voters elected with new one’s for not voting a certain way?
FACETIOUS QUESTION 2 Is it not Unconstitutional for 23 senators from northern and southern states to be unlawfully excluded from the US Senate in order to secure this 2/3 vote?
Does it not violate the SUPREMACY CLAUSE of The U.S. Constitution which holds the Constitution to be the SUPREME LAW

BEN SWANN PROMORELEASE OF RESEARCH POSTER

Support us by sharing and "liking' our posts.

About

We at RTR TRUTH MEDIA exist and work very hard every day to expose the corruption in government and in the corporations behind, under and over them. We have revealed and exposed the fact that in 1868, a Secret Constitution was created by the Corporate Personhood created by the unlawful armed coercion of 11 States delegates being forced out of the ratification process of the 14th Amendment and Reconstruction. This enslaved is all and used Black Americans, as if slavery was not bad enough on everyone affected, we were all pitted against eachother under the guise of freedom, which never was to be, replacing rights with "PRIVLEGES" . How about we end slavery once and for all ?

%d bloggers like this: